Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trakai Island Castle Chapel, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

File:Trakai Island Castle Chapel, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2015 at 09:58:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Trakai Island Castle Chapel, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trakai Island Castle Chapel, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pofka -- Pofka (talk) 09:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 03:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very different from your usual work—probably the plainest religious-building interior you've photographed IIRC. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

• Maybe plainest but with one of the richest and the most painful history. It might have been the last religious place for many castle defenders. -- Pofka (talk) 09:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, this is a simple chapel, but it is the chapel of a very important castle in Lithuania, as Pofka mentions, and dates to the 14th or early 15th century. I don't think it's that plain though. There is a lot of character in the stones and bricks. :-) I find whitewashed churches much more plain. Diliff (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as per Daniel C. above. Yann (talk) 09:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Diliff (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 16:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very fine in detail as usual but I don’t approve of the distortion on the chandelier, the ceiling flange of which looks almost vertical in this projection. Too much of wide-angle for me. --Kreuzschnabel 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't think there's actually much distortion of the chandelier. It's fairly typical of the view looking diagonally up at it. This is the original image of the chandelier taken with a 50mm lens (so there should be little distortion - it's not perspective corrected and 50mm is not wide angle). The chandelier in the panorama is slightly more vertically stretched as a result of the perspective correction, but it looks similar enough to me. Diliff (talk) 09:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 07:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors