Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre di Tertiveri.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Torre di Tertiveri.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2023 at 00:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Expepper - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment The wires at the bottom are distracting. Many uploads by this photographer are over-processed (with extreme contrast and vignetting), so I would not be surprised that this picture here suffers from heavy post-treatment too, because it seems over-saturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Compare also File:Particolare affresco Villa Giulia.jpg by the same photographer to realistic colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't mind the wires as much, but would love to see what the original of this shot looks like - like Basile I suspect over-processing. The shot itself is dramatic enough and I would support if the colors were natural. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment In general I agree with your concerns, but honestly the colours seem not too exagerrated in this case – when a ray of sunshine hits a stubble field it can really shine with vivid bright colours. I have seen that several times. So there has probably been some boosting of the colours in post but the result seems still realistic to me. I do mind the wires; maybe we could clone them out (and upload the result as a derivative file and nominate it here as an alternative) – do you think it’s worth to try it? --Aristeas (talk) 11:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Cloning out the wires sounds like a good idea, but if voters have found post-processing to be overkill, then offering an alternative version will only waste your time. It would be good to hear more opinions before deciding whether to offer an improved alternative or withdraw. -- IamMM (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, I agree with you. --Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Cloning out the wires sounds like a good idea, but if voters have found post-processing to be overkill, then offering an alternative version will only waste your time. It would be good to hear more opinions before deciding whether to offer an improved alternative or withdraw. -- IamMM (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment taken on midday in the july, but looks like sunset/sunrise time. -- Ivar (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder if that might be a fill-in sky from Photoshop? Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Ivar and my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Neutral per Kritzolina, but Iifar's comment is concerning, to say the least. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)- Oppose per others, both on the wires distracting and the unnatural look. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral IMO the wires are too disturbing. --XRay 💬 12:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for your comments. This nomination does not seem to have a chance to pass. -- IamMM (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
