Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Perch at Binsey, January 2017.jpg

File:The Perch at Binsey, January 2017.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2017 at 17:57:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Perch at Binsey, January 2017.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Perch at Binsey, January 2017.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Peter Trimming - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 17:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Info a 17th-century Grade II listed building, and an example of English architecture from the time; a nicely composed picture that is sharp and of historic value. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 17:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please explain why you like this photo and support featuring it. I'm not seeing that but would like to consider what you have to say. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your query, I've added some more info at the top. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

• I appreciate that. My feeling, though, is that the composition is perfectly OK but not great and exceptional. I think I'd want more sky, possibly a brighter day (though I realize those are at a premium in the UK) or time of day, and for the photo to extend further right and encompass the rest of the structure if possible. Therefore, in the end, I do  Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

• I like this shot. Cycle bothers, but i miss some more light to plus it. --Mile (talk) 07:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad light conditions. -- -donald- (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm just not wowed. A QI perhaps. Daniel Case (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)