Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg

File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2014 at 09:25:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg

715

1556

858

153

5091

2863

Green fringing on pillars and what happened to the 'S' - like there is a red ghost letter? -- Slaunger (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Tele2 Arena in Stockholm at night. Created, uploaded annd nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Quite good and of good resolution. I should be careful to judge the technical quality too hard in full resolution as the pixelage is quite high, but there is some quite notable green fringing, and there is a washed-out/ghost like appearance of some of the letters. Its not terribly important, but a little distracting. You have not suffered from shutter snap during the exposure? I am saying this because it looks similar to some recent problems I have had, where I believe it was due to shutter snap. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

 Comment New version uploaded Slaunger, all green fringing is removed.

Only some electronic signs have small ghosts, everything else is sharp. Probably because of the signs (small movement). No shutter snap, and I used exposure delay mode who allways have been enough (and took 20+ different photos of the arena). Imo, high quality even when compared to other full resolution FP wide-angle images.--ArildV (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

 Neutral That helped, thanks, and your other explanations makes sense regarding the technical quality. I think there is too much of the photo which is black for me to fully support. I think it would have been better a little earlier when there was still a bit more dusk light avaiable to see the details in between the lights. --Slaunger (talk) 21:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with the concept that all evening / night images must be taken during the blue hour. However, nothing is black here (the sky is dark blue and no details are lost because of the darkness in the foreground. But since the foreground is quite uninteresting, and the background just sky I think it is perfect conditions to get the arena to stand out.--ArildV (talk) 07:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

• Weak  Support May be another crop at the bottom is recommended.--XRay ^talk 08:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done Thank you I think its a improvement--ArildV (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 11:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support very nice! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose So we've got a metallic mesh structure illuminated with some blue neons, there's a few street lamps and trees here and there, the whole by night and hence without a much interesting lighting (if we don't consider the neons as interesting). Am I missing something? -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 19:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Very nice architecture and certainly an interesting structure. However, I do not find the particular composition very interesting. The street lamps, trees etc. makes it a bit messy. Sorry. Pugilist (talk) 07:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--DXR (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture