Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teele Wali Masjid-Lucknow-Uttar Pradesh-DSC 0001.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Teele Wali Masjid-Lucknow-Uttar Pradesh-DSC 0001.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2021 at 13:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#India
Info This place is not well documented. To my knowledge, this photo is one of the very few (perhaps the only one) that document the interior of this beautiful mosque. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 07:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)- Info All by me -- Dey.sandip (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- Mild Support: Some comparable photos are sharper than this one is in some places, but it's quite beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Weak support I like the figure in the middle. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Blurry child. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment A little bit of motion blur is there, but its such a small portion of the frame. And that's really a reason to oppose !! I hope you understand that this photograph is not about the child, that's a reference to provide some scale. Some reasons are well, just plain bizarre or laughable. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 12:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- CommentPlease don't call my comments 'plain bizarre or laughable'. And please don't patronize me and tell me how to 'see' your image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I am not telling you how to see my image. The same applies to your comment as well. Please don't ask me how to interpret or call your comment. If I feel its laughable, then I would stick to it -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. Wrt Dey.sandip's argument, the child is not merely a small reference to provide some scale but pretty much the centerpiece; along the central line in the otherwise only empty space. To me the child does not enhance the picture but does the contrary by removing an otherwise serene atmosphere, and the blur just makes it worse. --Trougnouf (talk) 08:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 14:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Moral Support. Have refined the gallery link: the photo fits even better into the gallery for interiors of religions buildings. --Aristeas (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Trougnouf. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Througnouf, as well, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per Trougnouf -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
