Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tatto Collection of the Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires of Montreal, 1925.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tatto Collection of the Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires of Montreal, 1925.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2018 at 00:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media#Others
Info All by -- Photographer 00:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Dark, unsharp and noisy -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Basile Morin Thanks, I added a new version, however, remember that it is almost 100 years old human skin and I do not think that seeing sudoriparous glands will add any additional value to the composition. Let me see if its ok for you know, thanks --Photographer 01:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Not ok, sorry, because the picture has been downsized, and is still unsharp IMO. Per COM:I : "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file." -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Basile Morin Uploaded a full version, btw its not downsized (a D7200 can take pictures in a max size of 6000x4000), however, I let the original size how you asked me --Photographer 01:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- "Not downsized" ? Image measuring 4000 x 2978 px from the original size 6158 x 4584 px is not downsized ? That's 42% of the surface. Still there in the file history -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Basile Morin Uploaded a full version, btw its not downsized (a D7200 can take pictures in a max size of 6000x4000), however, I let the original size how you asked me --Photographer 01:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Basile Morin Thanks, I added a new version, however, remember that it is almost 100 years old human skin and I do not think that seeing sudoriparous glands will add any additional value to the composition. Let me see if its ok for you know, thanks --Photographer 01:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose for FP per Basile, but The Photographer, have you considered VIC for this kind of photo? I haven't checked to see if it's best in its scope, but this is the kind of photo that could be good for illustrating an online article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- And very difficult to take because the permission and low light conditions --Photographer 02:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Undoubtedly, that helped make it very difficult or perhaps impossible to take an FP of this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- And very difficult to take because the permission and low light conditions --Photographer 02:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough, I'm afraid.--Peulle (talk) 06:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
