Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tatoosh Range WA MRNP1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tatoosh Range WA MRNP1.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2018 at 01:28:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Acroterion - uploaded by Acroterion - nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Oppose very nice scene - but the image quality is far too low (unsharp and possibly overprocessed). Sorry --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's a 9-year-old image taken on a now-retired camera that had a hard time with lighting conditions like that. I may try an alternate version with different noise reduction, but I may not be able to overcome the original imaage's limitations. Acroterion (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Martin; there's too much detail loss.--Peulle (talk) 10:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose A slam-dunk if it was sharper ... Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Regrettably. Probably would've been FP when it was taken -- it's a great scene when viewed at low resolution, but I don't think it quite has the detail necessary for FP of such a subject now. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you all, your comments mirror my views. This is a frustrating image - I like it as a picture, but I really wish I'd had a Canon 5D at the time to shoot it with, nine years ago the 400D just wasn't quite up to the conditions. Neither more nor less processing will help, and I'll
withdraw the nomination. Acroterion (talk) 01:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
