Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img60 StPeter Church.jpg

File:Tartu asv2022-04 img60 StPeter Church.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 10:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img60 StPeter Church.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu asv2022-04 img60 StPeter Church.jpg

2868

44

1820

1192

7280

4550

overdenoise and oversharpening

2490

2210

524

436

7280

4550

overdenoise and oversharpening

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Estonia
•  Info Interior view of St. Peter's Church in Tartu, all by me --A.Savin 10:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 10:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral A noise reduction filter was applied excessively, eliminating details (for example, the textures on walls and lamps) and later an excessive sharpening filter was applied, which caused noise especially in the ceiling and in some areas of the wall. I have added some notes --Wilfredor (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. Time to put Estonia on my travel wishlist. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -– George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per Wilfredo; the NR seems to have made the stained glass windows at the rear look drawn in. We have a bar for church interiors, and it's been set higher than this. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Wilfredo, could there maybe be a less sharpened version? Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support In general I agree with Wilfredo that we should accept more (natural) noise in photos and stop with the habit of excessive noise reduction and oversharpening. But when compared with other photos this photo IMHO shows neither excessive noise reduction nor excessive sharpening. (Of course I would welcome less noise reduction.) --Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blown windows and per Daniel Case. --Ermell (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)