Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tartu Kunstimuuseum detsembriõhtul.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tartu Kunstimuuseum detsembriõhtul.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 05:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Hendrik Mändla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful blue hour, however the ghosts (6 people in the center plus 2 at the left) are distracting. It would have been possible to avoid them, either by waiting the right moment, or by taking 2 pictures, merged together afterwards. Moreover, I think this nomination promoted last month is showing the spectacular inclination of the building better. In this case, due to the point of view, the angle appears less explicit. We notice the edges are not vertical, but they give the feeling that "the perspective should be fixed", more than "the building is special" -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)- Oppose The blue hour is one of my appreciated time of the day to take pictures, especially architecture. In excellente architecture photography, the edges of buildings must be vertical. The most disturbing objects in this picture are the electric wires with the light bulbs -- Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Your subjective appreciation of the light bulbs is respectable, however, note that the building itself is not vertical in reality. Due to the inclination, it is named the Tartu Pisa Tower. But your feeling confirms mine: this specificity is not obvious enough, from that angle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Mostly for the ghosts, but also the verticals on the building to the left are not vertical. BigDom (talk) 11:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I might be biased here, but still: too much sky, and the ghosts are really annoying. Also, the crop of the left building is not quite good, maybe because of its (too) prominent placement, with the result that it looks "cut". --A.Savin 23:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Weak oppose I might have come down on the weak support side if I hadn't already seen A. Savin's picture of this same building, which in my view has a better composition and, surprisingly, better light - I like blue hour shots as much as the next man, but in this case I find it all a little too yellow. Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
