Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taraxacum seed or Dandelions.JPG

File:Taraxacum seed or Dandelions.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2015 at 16:20:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Taraxacum seed or Dandelions.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taraxacum seed or Dandelions.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created by TripWire - uploaded by TripWire - nominated by TripWire -- TripWire (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- TripWire (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment DoF small, overexposed areas.--XRay ^talk 07:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Mostly flower with brown-ground background looks not beautiful. (This is not flower though...) + overexposed + oversharpened + noisy. --Laitche (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Added a fresher version which contains the exif data. The full exif data is now visible on the image page. Thanks.--TripWire (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
• @Slaunger: Fixed. Yann (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Verified! Thanks, Yann! -- Slaunger (talk) 15:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For such a common and photogenic seed head, I'd expect much higher standard for FP. The central part also appears blown of any details. -- Colin (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Info From where I come from, this isnt common. The central part is as it is. The plant was left untouched.--TripWire (talk) 16:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)