Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney Opera House 01.jpg

File:Sydney Opera House 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2018 at 20:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney Opera House 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney Opera House 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Bgag - uploaded by Bgag - nominated by Bgag -- Bgag (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bgag (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose A well-done image, deservedly a QI, of a much-photographed landmark that does not make me feel like I haven't seen it before. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good image, but for such a much-photographed subject you really have to knock it out of the park to stake a claim for it being one of the best images on Commons. In this case, the lighting is unimpressive.--Peulle (talk) 23:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel and Peulle. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others - it's a very good photo you should be proud of, but it's not a breathtaking, unbelievable photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the above comments.--Peulle (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

• Peulle, it is a bit unnecessary to put up these FPX tags when the "fifth day clean-up bot" will take care of it anyway (section 8/1). You don't have to rub a new FPC nominator's nose in that their photo will not be featured if it doesn't have any very obvious fault. --cart-Talk 17:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

• Ah, sorry, I thought it was the fpx thing that made it go off the list quicker. My bad. --Peulle (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

• The bot doesn't care about these templates, they only alert that this can be removed and that has to be done manually, often by me. --cart-Talk 17:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)