Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunset over the ice of Brofjorden 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sunset over the ice of Brofjorden 1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2022 at 07:39:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
- Info created by W.carter - uploaded by W.carter - nominated by Артём 13327 -- Артём 13327 (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Артём 13327 (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I like the "fire and ice" vibe of this photo, but as nice as it is for you to nominate one of Cart's photos, I don't think she would want one of her photos to be considered here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 08:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I was just made aware of this nom. I didn't get any 'ping' and I seldom visit this section now. I already know that my photos are boring and of inferior quality for FPC. I have no desire to run the gauntlet here again. --Cart (talk) 20:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pity! For me, this is a great recording that I would have loved to have made myself.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment In my personal opinion, after viewing your photos, they are the exact opposite of being boring or of inferior technical quality. You have the attentive eye for fascinating details, which are underrepresented in this forum. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Cart, I understand your decision, but I have to admit that I really would have liked to vote for this photo. For me, it’s clearly one of the best shots on Commons (and you are clearly one of the best photographers we have). I have still no reliable internet connection, but this photo is so good that I had to borrow a friend’s computer just to comment on this one. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I thought only the nominator could withdraw nominations? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Read the rules. General rules #6: "Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time." --Cart (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- FYI: I have been reprimanded about withdrawing this nom, I stand corrected and apologize to the nominator Артём 13327. It was rude since the nomination was made in good faith, and they have no idea about old feuds on FPC. My bad.
- It was also pointed out that since I donate my photos to the WikiProject, they should be available to be used anywhere on Commons or Wikipedia, even on FPC and QIC, unless there is some very special reason. I see the logic in that.
- So, use my photos as you see fit, here, QIC or any other part of the project. I will however take the same position as JJ Harrison does, and stay out of nominations and discussions. Accept or reject my photos as they are, do not ask me to alter them and please don't overwrite them. I agree with what Frank Schulenburg said here, but of course, he is more diplomatic and have better manners than me. Someday, in the future, perhaps the FPC will once again be a less toxic place where photographers will enjoy exchanging ideas in a collegial way, but I think that would involve some major changes.
- 'Pinging' those who have been involved in this nom: A.Savin, Famberhorst, Radomianin, Aristeas, Ikan Kekek, Charlesjsharp, Daniel Case. I apologize for my abrupt behavior and the inconvenience. --Cart (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Apology accepted as always. I know I am not alone in regretting your absence from this forum. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for reactivating the nomination. When the mentioned feuds had their peak time on FPC, I was not yet active in this forum. But in my opinion, now and then such poisonous echoes can be heard, which are far beyond appropriate criticism. This is unfortunate, because FPC is a place for all interested photo enthusiasts. So I understand your attitude to this issue, which should be respected by regular users despite the Commons usage rulebook. Nevertheless, I have hope that we will all be able to help make this important forum a kinder place. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support per above. I love the contrast of ‘fire and ice’, of warm and cold colours etc., the timeless beauty and the serene mood. --Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Great, atmospheric capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Cart, it's very broadminded of you to allow us to vote on this, and lest there be any confusion, I mean that totally sincerely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, of course. Has a nice otherworldly feel to it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Sweden