Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg

File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2019 at 09:52:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg

1333

1213

2653

4253

4000

6000

suggested crop -- Colin (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
•  Info All by Eatcha -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 09:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 15:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The contrail is a shame. Charles (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A beautiful motif but I think it lacks detail, there's almost no detail in the trees (probably because of noise reduction going too far). Perhaps have another go with less noise reduction applied? Again, the composition and motif are lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is lacking in detail --BoothSift 01:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
• Tempered  Support - We're looking into the mist at sunrise. This is the kind of photo that's all about light, shade and composition, not detail. Compare File:Monet - Impression, Sunrise.jpg. Would you complain about a "lack of detail" in that painting? I'm guessing you wouldn't, because the artist is so famous now. Eatcha may be pretty unknown at this point, but that doesn't mean we should dismiss a photo that is intentionally about a mood, an impression, and the beauty of the play of light, shadow and fog on sky, land and water, and not about the smaller details that would represent a different style. The only reason my support is currently tempered is that the subtle striations in the sky aren't an effect of nature, but of mild posterization. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• Ikan makes a fair point. I have struck my oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 07:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Christof46 (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The reflection and colours are nice and I don't care about detail in the trees. But the contrail is a shame. It is so noticeable and distracting. Perhaps some careful Photoshopping could remove it. I think the almost centred composition isn't great and there's too much height. I'll suggest a crop that I think makes a better image. -- Colin (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Colin, what do you think ? -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 20:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I'm OK with this change, though I'm not sure I prefer it. But when you make a change, you should ping everybody who's voted or commented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• Ping Charles,Boothsift,Cmao20,Yann and Christof46 -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 02:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Worse I'm afraid. I don't think you should Photoshop the contrail as you chose to take the photo with it there. But if you do remove it, you need to get rid of it all. Charles 08:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for notifying me. I do prefer this crop, but the image, although very beautiful, doesn't say a lot to me personally. Maybe I've seen too many trees-reflected-in-water shots recently but for me it would need to be really extra special for me to vote for it with the limited detail in the trees, which does still bother me. Anyway, as it stands now it'll become FP so congratulations. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
• We don't get to choose when aircraft cross the sky to spoil a clean view, and contrails can hang about for a very long time. They are quite commonly removed in photos, as are dust spots, Charles. -- Colin (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support now. -- Colin (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan Daniel Case (talk) 01:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 02:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 16:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support breathetaking — althought slightly lurid; FPC's let worse through though. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great compo and light Poco² 17:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 03:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 16:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Reflections