Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sumida desupre.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sumida desupre.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2016 at 03:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created by Daryan Shamkhall - uploaded by NMaia - nominated by NMaia -- ~★ nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 03:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- ~★ nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 03:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - My reaction is that this is very gray and hazy/smoggy, and there's nothing special about the crops. It's a decent picture but not a great one worthy of being specially selected to feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek What do you mean by, "there's nothing special about the crops"? I want to see what you are seeing but do not follow. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm saying that I don't see convincing reasons for where the margins of the picture frame are. Does that make sense? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek What do you mean by, "there's nothing special about the crops"? I want to see what you are seeing but do not follow. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - per M. Kekek. KennyOMG (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose This is pretty good, but I don't like the smog or the areas that are in shadow. Overall I'm just not wowed. INeverCry 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support I sure do like it. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice cityscape but too colorless, smog and white buildings notwithstanding. Seems overexposed to me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Did you mean for this to be a support? It sounds like an oppose rationale. INeverCry 17:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oops! Thanks ... you were correct. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)