Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang". 31-05-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg

File:Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang". 31-05-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2021 at 05:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang". 31-05-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang". 31-05-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others art object.
•  Info From 1900, trainsets drove by without any problems Stavoren onto the ferry in the direction of Enkhuizen. The freight connection got busy used, but fell into disrepair in the 1930s. In 1936 the last pont out of the so-called ponthole. The building was demolished in 1950.
  With this replica, this special connection becomes reminded.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting view. Because of the rail line I also like your alternative version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I prefer the other version, which I would support for FP. Not sure about this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for your suggestion. I will post the other version as an alternative.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 11:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I like both equally. The one below has a more classic composition with leading lines, but this one is a bit more bold and in-your-face. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unlike the rest of you, I really don't feel this one as an FP. I feel that the subject is too much in my face and that it doesn't add up to a great composition that's easy to move my eyes around. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per King of Hearts. --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I would support both versions. --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I clearly prefer this version. --Cayambe (talk) 10:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I personally like this more than the other option, as the blue mast in the larger option does not completely distract from the composition, unlike the smaller cropped version, where it distracts from the gate.Lectrician2 (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Conditional support I was unable to leave a note on the image nomination page, but I think it could stand to be cropped in a little on either side, and some from the bottom, to get rid of that tree and maintain the symmetry and leading lines. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for your suggestion. Thanks for your suggestion. If I cut the tree away, some of the depth of the photo is lost.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I think at this point, with the vote tally at 12-1 vs. 10-0, it is not clear which one to promote. Any suggestions on how we should decide? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Percentage points? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

The chosen alternative is: File:Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang". 31-05-2021 (actm.) 03.jpg