Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St John Baptist woodcarved statuette from Groeden.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:St John Baptist woodcarved statuette from Groeden.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 14:56:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
- Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support but looks a bit underexposed to me --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the support. I kept the image rather dark to correct partially the glare (the worst was corrected by retouching). But I believe a darker view gives a bit of intimacy to this very peculiar representation of Saint John. In any case I added a brighter version for evaluation --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose --Underexposed. Increasing the brightness might cause problems with the highlights.--Ermell (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose --Underexposed --Mile (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed. -- Pofka (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --fedaro (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose--Peulle (talk) 10:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
- Comment I propose a new version - --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Why is this sort of image so noisy? Charles (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Charles. Just not quite sharp enough. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose--Peulle (talk) 10:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I downsized "this sort of image" (thanks Charles) because it is a cropped image while the original size of 5,504 × 8,256 pixels was maintained. It should look better now at full size --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- By 'this sort of image', I just meant a 'studio' shot, not an outdoors shot. Charles (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charles and Daniel Case. -- Pofka (talk) 14:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)