Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spinning Fire.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2013 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Dey.sandip - uploaded by Dey.sandip - nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)- Weak Support. It's a strong, striking image that I think would have been better if it had been able to focus on a single one, the top one. Its center is not blown, and overall it looks better. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 11:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Bad crop, no "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, your comment doesn't help, please define how you see "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, you cannot ask somebody to define what is "wow" for him...--Jebulon (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, I can ask. If I feel, the reason of oppose is cryptic, I can surely ask for a clarification. That helps me understand the viewpoint in an objective way, and if its possible I can fix the issue. In this case, the lack of "wow" may be because there are composition issues, or may be the image does not have enough colors, or may be its not of a statue or building in broad daylight, who knows ? I feel its better to seek clarification instead of guessing around. And of course, the reviewer may not respond, as is the case mostly here. What I don't understand is that, the reviewer can speak for himself, or herself, do you need to actually provide him a voice ?
Believe, its somewhat unsolicited, especially as your comment doesn't have anything to do with the review of the image --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, I can ask. If I feel, the reason of oppose is cryptic, I can surely ask for a clarification. That helps me understand the viewpoint in an objective way, and if its possible I can fix the issue. In this case, the lack of "wow" may be because there are composition issues, or may be the image does not have enough colors, or may be its not of a statue or building in broad daylight, who knows ? I feel its better to seek clarification instead of guessing around. And of course, the reviewer may not respond, as is the case mostly here. What I don't understand is that, the reviewer can speak for himself, or herself, do you need to actually provide him a voice ?
- Sorry, you cannot ask somebody to define what is "wow" for him...--Jebulon (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, your comment doesn't help, please define how you see "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Apparently no interest from people.
