Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South face of the Transamerica Pyramid, 2017.jpg

File:South face of the Transamerica Pyramid, 2017.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 22:27:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:South face of the Transamerica Pyramid, 2017.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South face of the Transamerica Pyramid, 2017.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 22:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- dllu (t,c) 22:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Info There exists a similar FP, File:TransAmerica Pyramid.jpg. Compared to that picture, this presently nominated photo:

• Is taken from a different face (south instead of west).
• Has not been digitally altered to remove the scaffolding, visible on the left.
• Has vastly superior image quality thanks to modern equipment. dllu (t,c) 22:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Kind of mesmerizing, and a vast improvement over the old FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support But seems redundant to keep the old FP - can we delist it or is that bad form? -- Thennicke (talk) 05:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - If you feel that it's no longer of the quality that we would consider an FP, you can nominate it for delisting on this page, but be prepared for less than unanimous agreement. Also, keep in mind that unlike VIC, where the title of VI is given to only one nominee per scope, on FPC, we don't need to pick only the best photo of a motif for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 16:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support We can certainly have both of these as FPs. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support WClarke 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --fedaro (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 13:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Prismo345 (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture