Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Site des Orgues 016.jpg

File:Site des Orgues 016.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2020 at 11:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Site des Orgues 016.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Site des Orgues 016.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A QI, if that. Seems an odd crop. Random soil and harsh light. -- Colin (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Info Random soil? Here you can see, where the photo was taken. --Llez (talk) 20:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I like this. If these strange shapes didn't exist in nature, it would take someone very imaginative to invent them. As for the light, I think this motif benefits from a strong portrayal, and in no way does it look overly bright to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Because of originality --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Special.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Imaginative.- Henry39 (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose, agree with Colin, seems random crop, no good idea what rock formation I am looking at. Renata3 (talk) 11:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seems like the sky and ground were processed separately without smoothing the boundaries between them enough ... look at the odd CA on the sides of the upper rock that are in shade. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Corrections done --Llez (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I like the crop, I'm not sure how it could have been done much better. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Colin and Renata. I don’t like the framing showing only an arbitrary small fraction of the rock. I’d prefer a whole view like this one. --Kreuzschnabel 15:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural