Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shah Mosque (Imam mosque) in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Shah Mosque (Imam mosque) in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 07:44:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
- Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support I love this picture and would have nominated it myself had you not chosen to present it at FPC. The light is magical. Cmao20 (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Question is there anything you can do to reduce the highlights on the top --Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: yes. its possible to reduce the highlights , but in my opinion, details and patterns are visible and there isn't overexposure section .beside, lowering the highlights at the light source is not wise and make the photo look unreal.--Amirpashaei (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- +1. No point in turning bright white highlights into dull grey highlights when you're not recovering any actual detail. Some things in real life simply are blindingly bright. Cmao20 (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not asking for grey spots instead of bright light sources, to me it's still a tick too much. It might be a matter of taste, I'd have processed it a different way. Also a horizontal perspective correction to get the horizontals on the floor horizontal would be good Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- horizontal stones line with horizontal line of quran (in the middle of the picture) not parallel and if I correct perspective with floor stone the horizontal line of the middle of the picture will tilt . you can test it in photoshop.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not asking for grey spots instead of bright light sources, to me it's still a tick too much. It might be a matter of taste, I'd have processed it a different way. Also a horizontal perspective correction to get the horizontals on the floor horizontal would be good Poco a poco (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- +1. No point in turning bright white highlights into dull grey highlights when you're not recovering any actual detail. Some things in real life simply are blindingly bright. Cmao20 (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: yes. its possible to reduce the highlights , but in my opinion, details and patterns are visible and there isn't overexposure section .beside, lowering the highlights at the light source is not wise and make the photo look unreal.--Amirpashaei (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support as is per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Deserving overall, but I fully agree with Poco that the brightest highlights are blown. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: , @Ikan Kekek: , I adjusted the highlight.--Amirpashaei (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not much difference to me, at least in the chandelier. I think the details that were in the blown areas were already gone and can't be recovered. But still an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Gnosis (talk) 17:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran