Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seven Saints (Седмочисленици, Св Наум).jpg

File:Seven Saints (Седмочисленици, Св Наум).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 15:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Seven Saints (Седмочисленици, Св Наум).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seven Saints (Седмочисленици, Св Наум).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Macedonia
•  Info Seven Saints who honored in several southeast European Orthodox Churches as the creators and distributors of the Cyrillic and Glagolitic alphabet. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment There is chroma noise in the upper part. Also, please add fresco category.--Peulle (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
• Peulle its handheld, ISO 1600. Frescos added.--Mile (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Question I came across similar paintings in Cappadocia and I can't really compare, but I'm wondering if this shouldn't be a bit more saturated - Benh (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
• Peulle,Benh check again, true, its is more saturated, i had too much red/blue inside, and put offset and gamma. I have catalogue beside, and now is more comparable. They even put more, but again, its about camerman who made it, i dont like too much saturated...more to be real. This one in St Naum all are very out-of-saturation. Can you show me that one you saw ? 7 saints is very rare, and Greeks dont have it, more Slavic people. --Mile (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

• Not doubting the value of the photo. Just questioning the saturation. Here is what I saw in Cappadocia [1]. I left default setting (just tweaked the WB). - Benh (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, i think there is more saturated even in real. --Mile (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Question To me it looks like a shot of mediocre quality of an old fresco. What makes it special for FP? was there no way to use a support and achieve a quality shot? --Poco² 18:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• Talk the talk, walk the walk. Would be glad to compare. --Mile (talk) 19:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

• Pick up any of these: 1 (better quality), 2 (more interesting work), 3 (looks similar to yours but 600 years older!) Poco² 20:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)