Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sedov (ship, 1921) and Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, France.jpg/2

File:Sedov (ship, 1921) and Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, France.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2014 at 17:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sedov (ship, 1921) and Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, France.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sedov (ship, 1921) and Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, France.jpg/2

•  Info All by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Category proposed : Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles

•  Support Previously nominate. But the image is so different after reworking that I give it a second chance. I hope that the new edition will lead to you forget the backgound issues of the first nomination. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support nice ! -- Jiel (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose As much as I'm a fan of the soft golden hour and the overall composition, it simply doesn't work here. The boat is extremely rich visually with a lot of little details here and there that get entirely lost with the overly complex background. Even the overall silouhette of the boat is not necessarily easy to grasp depending on the resolution of the image being looked at. -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Too dark overall. If the whites would be blown out by increasing the exposure, then you can do some selective lightening that preserves the highlights. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Jiel, Christopher Crouzet, King of Hearts

 Done Less dark, thanks. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 11:01, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

I think the contrast is a little too high now. Perhaps the whites should not be so bright. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done King of Hearts, new version, but it is a fact that the whites on the boat are a bit clipped and I can't do much more...however the image is improved, thank you for you useful help. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 04:43, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Question Underexposed ? --Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

No I don't think, the light is soft because it's the first sun rays, 30mn before it was the night, the RaW file seems correct and I did not make big changes in light levels during the editing process. I think the light is near like it was in reality. Maybe I shall have to wait a bit for a harcher light, but it was before to go to my job and I did not have the time. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 04:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

• Weak  Support. Nice image despite the flaws. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)