Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg

File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2021 at 06:11:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 06:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think this is nearly as good as File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg. The arrangement of bolts, nuts and washers is too random, unlike the simplicity of the bolts in the other one which sort of looked like some kind of bar chart. The highlights here are a bit too much (my eyes hurt) and the surrounds haven't been cleaned as well. I don't think you've balanced the lighting in this one very well, with some parts too dark and other parts too bright -- for example the mirrored/glass surface is showing its dirty surface on the right hand side, where it should perhaps only be showing reflections. -- Colin (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I really like the way this resembles a kind of neo-futuristic skyline (I'm thinking of things like the 1960s TV show, The Jetsons, but you could also think of the Star Trek movies or any number of other sci-fi shows or earlier architecture or dioramas with tall buildings that include circular, otherwise curvy or polygonal structures that aren't rectangular cuboids [3-dimensional rectangles]). There seem to be a number of hot pixels that it would be nice to clone out, and because the reflections of the screws, nuts and washers extend closer to the bottom than the equipment itself extends to the top, I'd like a more generous bottom crop if at all possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you for your advice. I just removed the hot pixel. --XRay 💬 18:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support. I still see one tiny blue/white hot pixel on the left, though (either that or it's a star). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I've found some of these pixel at the screws, but I think the reason are the screws itself. --XRay 💬 05:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I added a note. Just about due left of the bottom of the leftmost reflection that goes down almost to the bottom of the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you! That's very helpful. I found the pixel (and another one too). It's fixed now. --XRay 💬 09:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Great! Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Tomer T (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Has a nice touch of Metropolis etc., and the longer I compare it with Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg, the more I think it is neither worse nor better, but just different, both being very clever experiments. --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The capital city of the Planet of Robots, seen for the first time in the movie from the pod slowly coming in for a landing. I like that this one puts the tops of the screws and bolts on top; it looks more like that sort of CN Tower/Space Needle revolving-restaurant/observatory thing you see in more and more cities across the world these days. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer the one Colin links to, but taken in isolation, this is a great photo nonetheless. -- Cmao20 (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others