Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Stolzenfels 01 Koblenz 2015.jpg

File:Schloss Stolzenfels 01 Koblenz 2015.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 19:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Stolzenfels 01 Koblenz 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Stolzenfels 01 Koblenz 2015.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
•  Info created by Schaengel - uploaded by Schaengel - nominated by Till.niermann -- Till (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Till (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now. Great photo but quite a lot of green and purple CA dotted around. Can you fix that? Cmao20 (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Much better. A sharp and competently-executed photo of a beautiful motif, so it is FP to me now. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

• •  Comment I‘m afraid I don‘t have the means to do that. --Till (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The problem is that Schaengel has left us some years ago in a rage, therefore he will probably not help us here. --Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment Just removed the CAs in GIMP and brightened the forest a bit, but I don’t want to upload a new version during the voting. --Kreuzschnabel 09:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
      •  Comment Thank you! But as CAs seem to be an issue for all voters so far, it might be a good idea to replace the current image by the one that you corrected. --Till (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
        • There you are. Might not be perfect but CA shouldn’t be a serious issue any more. @A.Savin: , @Cmao20: , please re-check :) --Kreuzschnabel 16:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Apart from CA's, the light is a bit weak for me. --A.Savin 01:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose CAs, and light too harsh. --Kreuzschnabel 09:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)  Abstain as co-editor now ;) --Kreuzschnabel 16:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good edit and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Very weak oppose Low light (perhaps underexposed?) and large shaded areas in background throw this one off for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. @Kreuzschnabel: Thank you very much for your improvements! --Aristeas (talk) 13:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)