Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scheßlitz St.Kilian Orgel 1012571-HDR.jpg

File:Scheßlitz St.Kilian Orgel 1012571-HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2019 at 13:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Scheßlitz St.Kilian Orgel 1012571-HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scheßlitz St.Kilian Orgel 1012571-HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Organ loft of the catholic parish church St.Kilian in Scheßlitz. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. Great processing. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I like a lot of things about this photo, but I'm a bit frustrated by the discrepancy between the left and right margins. Why couldn't you get the photo truly symmetrical? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment The optical axis does not coincide exactly in the geometric centre of the building. Symmetry can therefore not be created later on the computer. As a guideline for the balance I have chosen the stairs on both sides. Personally, I find 100% symmetry not desirable either.--Ermell (talk) 08:43, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I certainly don't always demand symmetry, but I didn't like the bit of a column on the right vs. more of the column on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment A few technical remarks: 1) The windows are not bright enough, resulting in an flat "HDR" look. Let the whites blow out because there's no detail to be found anyways. 2) Please crop off the white bit in the lower left corner. 3) The perspective has not been fully corrected; it's still sloping in. 4) There's some asymmetry, per Ikan. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Now a corrected version. Thanks for the hints.--Ermell (talk) 08:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I like this better, but could you add back the outside of both flights of stairs? I think this tight a crop is not quite optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the reviews.--Ermell (talk) 13:48, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry that I have to oppose here. Technically very well done image, but for me the scenery is not ready for FP, as it is now. This church needs some fresh paint. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings