Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saucer magnolia at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (81274s).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Saucer magnolia at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (81274s).jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2017 at 04:59:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
- Info all by me — Rhododendrites talk | 04:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Saucer magnolia buds just starting to flower. — Rhododendrites talk | 04:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Simple, yet beautiful. --Peulle (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support PumpkinSky talk 12:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Background is disturbing. --Yann (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Yann, and the shadows hide the object -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I want to advocate for this one. We have several featured pictures of buds on uniform/flat backgrounds, which is a great way to highlight the object itself, but it largely separates it from the context -- that it is part of a tree. I wanted to keep the tree in the picture, and I think the shallow depth of field does that while keeping it in the background. @Yann and Basile Morin: Is there a way to address what you're talking about by increasing/decreasing the brightness of parts of the image (while keeping the same composition)? Perhaps it would've been a better idea to nominate this in the spring, too. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 03:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Only the right bud and closer would be better IMO --Llez (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - I love the buds, but per Yann. If that branch were above them on the picture frame and didn't overlap with them, this might be an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination thanks for the comments, all — Rhododendrites talk | 15:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)