Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter of Alcantara Church in Karviná-Doly 2020 01.jpg

File:Saint Peter of Alcantara Church in Karviná-Doly 2020 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2020 at 18:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter of Alcantara Church in Karviná-Doly 2020 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter of Alcantara Church in Karviná-Doly 2020 01.jpg

4241

1013

107

107

4860

3574

Point 1

4288

2716

107

119

4860

3574

Point 2

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Czech Republic
•  Info all by me -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I particularly like the contrast between the straight water surface and the reflexed church building which is leaning due to the coal mining affect. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think it's straight - regardless of how the building is leaning, a point on the building should be on the same vertical line as its reflection. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• I'm sorry but I'm afraid I don't get your point. The verticals of the building are displayed flipped over as they should be. Does your remark apply to this? --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• I have annotated two points which are supposed to be in a straight line. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice and unique building. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• It is slightly tilted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose until the above problem is fixed. For a building that is actually tilted in real life, it's important that the tilt is captured accurately on camera, otherwise the picture is misleading. At the moment it makes out that the tilt is more than it is; as KoH points out, you can tell by the reflection that the picture clearly slopes upwards to the right. Otherwise this is great and I'd like to be able to vote support. Cmao20 (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Info @King of Hearts and Cmao20: I've straightened the image per KoH's remarks. --T.Bednarz (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The mood is great. I wish the church was sharper, but maybe the softness is due to haze. --Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Despite the straightening no wow recognizable. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 05:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice early-spring early-morning mood, as noted, but not really that exceptional. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose for lack of wow, the mood/composition is not working for me. Renata3 (talk) 08:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel Case --Andrei (talk) 08:08, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)