Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Augustin Church Paris .jpg

File:Saint Augustin Church Paris .jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2013 at 04:56:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Augustin Church Paris .jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Augustin Church Paris .jpg

•  Info created by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 04:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 04:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator in en-wiki. Tomer T (talk) 07:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment seems to need just a tiny bit of perspective correction (unless the walls on the building at left are actually not vertical). Otherwise, it looks surprisingly good at full resolution, while the thumbnail made me think it's too dark. darkweasel94 07:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Despite minor flaws, a very nice picture. --Selbymay (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support as in EN:Wiki JKadavoor Jee 13:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose light, and no wow.--Claus (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I think the light is ok. :-) --Phyrexian ɸ 17:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I was there less than an hour ago. The perspective correction is too strong, and the light is not so good as it could be. Good picture, but not FP, IMO. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 08:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

• We discussed this earlier; but most (all) of them gave advantage to this angle of view. Maybe a picture with better lights in this AOV is possible. JKadavoor Jee 12:42, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I agree that this angle of view is extraordinary and far much better than "mine". "My" light and this picture would make a perfect FP, I guess. .--Jebulon (talk) 19:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Exactly. I wish if you make another attempt as it is from your homeland. :) JKadavoor Jee 05:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Jebulon, I'm confused. You voted oppose saying "I was there less than an hour ago. The perspective correction is too strong, and the light is not so good as it could be. Good picture, but not FP, IMO. Sorry." but then you wrote "I agree that this angle of view is extraordinary and far much better than "mine". "My" light and this picture would make a perfect FP, I guess." Are you still opposed or have you changed to support? --Pine^✉ 21:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I think he's saying that while the angle of view is good, the light isn't. darkweasel94 02:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Indeed. Sorry for late answer. No reason to be confused, I still oppose. And I think the vertical stretch (perspective correction) is too much (the window is circular in real, not so oval). @ Jee : the access to this point of view is not easy, cause it is a military place. But I'll try some day... ( not now: it is spring, and trees have leaves again...)--Jebulon (talk) 12:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)