Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Émilion, Aquitaine.jpg

File:Saint-Émilion, Aquitaine.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2014 at 15:08:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Émilion, Aquitaine.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Émilion, Aquitaine.jpg

•  Info created by JordyMeow - uploaded by JordyMeow - nominated by JordyMeow -- Jordy Meow (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jordy Meow (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment There isn't by any chance some room on the right for a crop placing the church according to the golden ratio or rule of thirds? — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 13:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  • I made some attempts and could not improve the crop. After some hestitation I think the crop is good as it is. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment After a bit of hesitation (regarding composition) I guess that this one can become FP. At the moment I am neutral, because a lot of details on the bright fassades are not yet visible (see note). The bright areas are not burnt out but could be brought out much better if you (selectively) reduce the highlights of the photo. If you make a test and reduce overall brightness of -1 EV you see how many details are still there. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Both sides are leaning out (it needs perspective correction). The composition is also tricky, it looks a bit cluttered Poco² 20:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Halavar (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support —Blurred Lines 13:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now. The perspective distortion and the highlights (already mentioned by Poco & Tuxyso) need to be corrected. Also the overall sharpness could be better. Composition is very nice. --mathias K 05:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose the image is totally distorted --Pava (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco and opposers. I don't understand the composition. To take a picture from a high point is not enough, I'm afraid.--Jebulon (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jebulon -- Colin (talk) 10:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)