Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SAOCOM 1A Mission (44262166295).jpg

File:SAOCOM 1A Mission (44262166295).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2019 at 19:10:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SAOCOM 1A Mission (44262166295).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SAOCOM 1A Mission (44262166295).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Space_exploration#Space_launch_vehicles
•  Info created by SpaceX - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by Msaynevirta -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Msaynevirta (talk) 19:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --BugWarp (talk) 00:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support WOW--Ermell (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Since there is so much land showing in the photo, it would be nice if the description also included where this was taken (launch pad, location, country, etc.). These launches are not common knowledge and people looking at the file page should not have to click back on WP links and categories to get such info. Please write a bit more. --Cart (talk) 07:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment added launch location to the description. --Msaynevirta (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment added Spanish description.--BugWarp (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now per Cart. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Impressive. However, I can not test the authenticity of "photography". It seems too much like composition to me. Sorry! --Steindy (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment To me it's a clear FP and I'm a fan of these shots on the spaceX Flickr page. But I'm missing more detailed and useful caption, which should be an added value of having the shot here. Which trail is take off, which one is landing? When are stages separation? Engine cut off? ... - Benh (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose wow is there, but resolution too low for me. --Ivar (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small, too dark, too many unsharp areas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Besides the technical objections, it's just a very random composition. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others --Boothsift 22:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 27 September 2019 (UTC)