Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri Waltensburg (actm) 24.jpg

File:Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri Waltensburg (actm) 24.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2019 at 15:43:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri Waltensburg (actm) 24.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri Waltensburg (actm) 24.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Memorial stone.
•  Info Waltensburg/Vuorz. Switzerland. Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri (Burg Jörgenberg). Memorial stone. A simple photo that fascinates me in one way or another.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Support per nom. It's a very good photo that has a good form and rewards moving my eyes around it. Not the most obvious FP, but I think it merits the designation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a technically correct photo. Unfortunately I can't find a wow effect. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 22:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't get it either, sorry --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell Poco² 18:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others--Boothsift 03:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Subject well-placed within frame. Nice surface sheen and signs of corrosion at bottom left, I thus assume bronze. Well captured and of historical interest. --Franz van Duns (talk) 17:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I completely agree with Franz van Duns. A beautiful shine, a nice depth and the ragged left side make this memorial plaque special. The little blue sky in the upper left also adds something to the photo. I don't vote in principle on the photo. Because it was made by my wife. But it is a shame that this photo will not make it.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

• You can vote, but honestly I'm afraid your voice at this point won't completely change the result. To give more explanations about my vote, I find the light excellent, the subject sharp, that's why I agree with Ermell "this is a technically correct photo". Unfortunately the memorial plaque is boring as hell, excuse my frankness (and my subjectivity). So the "no wow" is here : in this very ordinary object, not particularly magical, not sexy, not funny, just not special enough. Certainly a very good QI, but not something original to make an FP (other users may have different feelings of course). The name of this merchant was missing on the file page, I've added it in English and in German, because it is important for the search engines -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you for your explanation and addition. Even if my vote could have made a difference, I would not have voted. Then you violate your principle.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

• Better like that, I agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)