Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rostock asv2018-05 img63 Warnemuende port.jpg

File:Rostock asv2018-05 img63 Warnemuende port.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2019 at 11:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rostock asv2018-05 img63 Warnemuende port.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rostock asv2018-05 img63 Warnemuende port.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
•  Info "MS Regal Princess" leaving Warnemünde after sunset ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 11:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 11:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support even though far from being tack sharp (I'm guessing shooting conditions didn't help) - Benh (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

• you were on land it seems. - Benh (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

• Weak  Support despite noise and some blown-out areas, since a longer exposure or HDR would not have been possible. One thing that could have made it better: underexpose it at ISO 100 and bring it back up in post, since Sony sensors are ISO-invariant. Shooting at ISO 1000 is essentially throwing away highlights without any reduction in noise (compared to push-processing). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
• Weak Support per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support per King. Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
• @ King and all who says "per King": in fact, the remaining light was really very weak. The picture as it is, is already resulting from maximal possible DR increase in Lightroom. --A.Savin 01:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

  Indeed, I have no complaints about the noise as you did what you had to do, you shot this on a full-frame sensor at max aperture and perhaps the slowest shutter speed that freezes the ship. But there is room for improvement in the highlights; I would have given a full support if it were shot at ISO 100 and processed properly in Lightroom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

  You are missing my point -- if I had taken it with ISO-100, the picture would have been irrevocably underexposed. Sony does excellent job under bad light conditions, but cannot do magic either. Somewhere there is always the end of the line --A.Savin 10:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

  I see you did shadows +100, but exposure is only +0.66. With ISO 100 you would just do exposure +4.00. With highlights at -50 there's room to recover any overbrightened sections. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support ISO-4000 Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support I like the composition and the light, but there are some technical issues like sharpness and noise. --XRay ^talk 16:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Although it looks really nice on first sight, there are too many technical issues and we do have better images in this category. --MB-one (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships