Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rose Garden - NATO Vista Bridge 3 NBG LR.jpg

File:Rose Garden - NATO Vista Bridge 3 NBG LR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2017 at 13:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rose Garden - NATO Vista Bridge 3 NBG LR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rose Garden - NATO Vista Bridge 3 NBG LR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#United States
• Bridge from Rose Garden to NATO Vista at Norfolk Botanical Garden. All by me. PumpkinSky talk 13:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 13:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely colours.--Peulle (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment When I first saw this, I thought: WTF... are the blue and green CA visible at thumb??? File:Smiley emoticons doh.gif Very lovely but is the left pair of street lamps leaning or am I seeing things? --cart-Talk 18:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Commenting out emoticon per Jee because he says it's keeping the bot from closing this. PumpkinSky talk 03:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

• •  Comment The blue etc lights are there for a Christmas celebration they have going on. I'll look at the light poles. PumpkinSky talk 18:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

• The facepalm was directed at myself for having such a silly thought. :) --cart-Talk 19:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
• @W.carter: , as far as the poles, after spending quite some time looking at this, I think it was a little of both. Using the guide lines you can turn on in Lightroom, it was off verticle a tiny bit now per the guidelines it's straight. I also think there was and is a little optical illusion going on because of the curved tree trunk that is right beside it. I've done what I can with this and uploaded a new version, but I have little practice at perspective fixing. @Johann Jaritz: , JJ, I know you helped me with perspectives once before. Can you please take a look at this? Feel free to fix yourself or advise me, whatever you prefer. PumpkinSky talk 22:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

• @W.carter: , @Johann Jaritz: uploaded a better version than mine. Please review. Danke sehr Herr Jaritz! PumpkinSky talk 03:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Con mucho gusto! You are welcome! ;-) -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks Johann for fixing this. --cart-Talk 09:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment You are welcome too, W.carter. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --fedaro (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- HalfGig talk 21:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 13:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Image is not so sharp as it could be, but compo and scenery make it.--Mile (talk) 19:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Mile. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture