Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg

File:Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 15:46:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa floribunda 'Fée des Neiges' in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 18:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition and lighting are not optimal and the definiiton is not as we are used to seeing these days. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:58, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support Some of the noise and CA could be reduced; I think the highlights on the flower could stand to come down a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support By chance I know this cultivar, its unobtrusive beauty and its delicate, discreet scent; for it this rather poetic photograph with selective DoF is quite appropriate. Like Daniel I think the highlights could be dialed down a bit. --Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Charlesjsharp, the petals of the middle rose are kind of messy and disturbing. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 09:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing really wrong with it, but not outstanding either. Good QI though. --Kreuzschnabel 16:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)