Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rickshaw back decoration.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Rickshaw back decoration.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 18:40:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
- Info created by Mrb Rafi - uploaded by Mrb Rafi - nominated by Mrb Rafi -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I love these decorated Rikshas and this is a very good example of one well photographed, except - could you perhaps work on the corp a bit? I find the way the tires are cut off not ideal. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kritzolina, thanks a lot for the comment. I had a very tight place to bring the rickshaw in my frame with a 50mm prime. I took more than 15 photos of it and only this one looked better. I was also feeling uncomfortable as I couldn't capture the tires fully in the frame. Would you please tell more about how I can crop it to look better? --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see an ideal solution, but perhaps experimenting with cropping off more of the tires could help. Kritzolina (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support I think there is indeed no ideal solution, I will support anyways because of the beauty of the subject and the quality overall. Kritzolina (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see an ideal solution, but perhaps experimenting with cropping off more of the tires could help. Kritzolina (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kritzolina, thanks a lot for the comment. I had a very tight place to bring the rickshaw in my frame with a 50mm prime. I took more than 15 photos of it and only this one looked better. I was also feeling uncomfortable as I couldn't capture the tires fully in the frame. Would you please tell more about how I can crop it to look better? --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder if this is covered by {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. If not, we have a problem... Yann (talk) 10:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yann, Thanks a lot for the comment. Yes, it falls under {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. The rickshaw was parked beside a under-construction rail road and the owner was having breakfast. I captured it during a photowalk (the category is yet not populated, hundreds of images are on their way to be uploaded). --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's a utility object, just as any other vehicle. See COM:UA. --A.Savin 14:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Beautiful, but very tight crops left and right that are causing me to hesitate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support The quality is very good and the subject is very interesting. Though the crop is a draw back but IMO acceptable.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose tight crops, distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support per Fabian. --Aristeas (talk) 06:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support per Fabian. Background is a bit distracting. — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 07:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support per others.--Princess Rosalina 🍵 472998 08:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per SHB2000 --Ermell (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Cropped wheels and desaturated background, contrast, no wow. --Micha (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Regretful very weak oppose I like very much what this image wants to accomplish. But while it's definitely a QI, it isn't quite there for FP ... I think the background is just a little too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --El Grafo (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see any reason why the crop couldn't have been better, too tight in both sides and unfortunate at the bottom, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Nafiul adeeb (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Regardless of the outcome of this nomination, this could be a good COM:VIC nomination if it's best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support per others. Mehediabedin (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)