Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red flower, Berlin, Germany, in the evening, 2015-07-10.jpg

File:Red flower, Berlin, Germany, in the evening, 2015-07-10.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 13:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Red flower, Berlin, Germany, in the evening, 2015-07-10.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red flower, Berlin, Germany, in the evening, 2015-07-10.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
•  Info created by SDKmac - uploaded by SDKmac - nominated by SDKmac -- SDKmac (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I think the colours are quite good and there's a contrast. Let me hear what you think about it -- SDKmac (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose colours and contrast is fine - in a way - but in fact, its oversaturated. For becoming featured, it needs much more: Exceptional sharpness in the focused areas, lack of color noise, some more DOF, no chromatic aberrations and last but not least: no jpg artifacts. Please have a look at this gallery to compare. And at the very end, every flower has to be categorized correctly with a sufficient description. Red flower in Berlin is not a description for a featured picture at all. Its not sufficient enough to get this picture promoted as a quality image. I´m sorry, but you will do it better next time. Try first with the quality image process. --Hubertl 13:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Hubertl: Ok. Thank you. It's possible to de-nominate it? I'll do it better next time. --SDKmac (talk) 14:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment just use the {{Withdrawn}}-Tag, so the nomination will be removed. But you can also wait for some other opinions. I´m not the master photographer here! --Hubertl 14:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
• @SDKmac i recommend tripod and maybe stacking method for flowers. --Mile (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Hubertl, furthermore too much noise on bakckground --Ezarateesteban 22:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - To my eyes, it looks like nothing at all is in focus at full size. By the way, Hubertl, you're way more modest than you need to be. You are a master photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per everything Hubert says, particularly the noise issue, but even with those issues addressed I'd still find it compositionally busy. It's not just enough to have striking colors. Also, I'd try to find out what species this is and categorize it approproiately. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)