Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rabameeleolu.jpg

File:Rabameeleolu.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 11:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rabameeleolu.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rabameeleolu.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created and uploaded by Külli Kolina - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Really beautiful. Not too colorful, although kinda bright! Target360YT (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The landscape is nice but there are multiple quality issues that matter. The overall colours of the image are washed off; the water as well as some of the plants seem quite overexposed; the plants at the bottom are unsharp; there are also many noisy areas.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kiril Simeonovski's points. This looks a bit like a fantasy landscape, but with those colors and degree of focus, not quite a real one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Considering the time of the year and hour of the day (early October morning, where the frost is covering the land), then it would be unreasonable to say that the colors are washed out. And I don't see any overexposure problem. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

  Hi Ivo. The colours are not the main reason for opposition. There are also many noisy and unsharp areas, especially at the bottom of the image, while the tree on the left side has some chromatic aberration. Some of these issues may be fixed. The landscape is, however, very nice.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Per Kruusmagi's comment above. The frost gives the scene a surreal appearance ... it sort of looks like an old hand-tinted image. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment The focus looks strange to me. The tree in the foreground ist sharp, the plants behind this are unsharp and the trees in the background are again sharp. It looks to me like a failed focus stacking. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 00:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Berthold said it well, there is focus issue IMO impossible with a single shot. It look for me a photo montage of 2 photo, one with a very small DoF in foreground (first tree in focus and just behind totally out of focus), then a connection in the water with a second photo with a bigger DoF and a new focus point. In any case of what it is, photo montage or focus stacking, I find it a bit too disturbing, that jumped at my eyes the first time I opened it. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 16:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Weird focus with no explanation -- Thennicke (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to focus issues. They probably stacked two images but neglected the middle, which makes it look very unnatural. A pity because this is a great image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)