Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Réserve naturelle nationale du Bagnas 02.jpg

File:Réserve naturelle nationale du Bagnas 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2015 at 05:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Réserve naturelle nationale du Bagnas 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Réserve naturelle nationale du Bagnas 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 05:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 05:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Composition could be a little stronger but great light and colors. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Some swamp instead concrete feels better. --Mile (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose  Comment I've tried to find the wow factor but I couldn't find that, light and colors are good as King mentioned but not wow for me, for this kind of photo the lighting is softer like this one or dusk shot like this one would be better, IMHO, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 23:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC) That was bad decision, I should vote. --Laitche (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done @Laitche: your comment make me realize that the picture was much too bright, I decrease the brightness it a little, thus thank you even if you do not change your vote. -- Christian Ferrer 04:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

 Support that tipped the scales for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

• If you try to take similar composition and idea, clouds would also be good subject, just a suggestion. By the way cloning out that blue rubbish at the bottom left would be better if you can. --Laitche (talk) 11:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you again, every time I have come to expect cloudless skies, indeed it may be a slight wrong, or maybe not really fault but I should be trying also something else like cloudy skies, thanks too for the suggestion. -- Christian Ferrer 12:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roleček 19:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Definitely the quality is great, but I was unable to find the "WOW factor" here just like Laitche. I think it could be captured easily by anyone who has such equipment and travels through. It raises doubts for me if that really is a special picture in any way. Your other nature works like this one or this has much more in them. This one? Probably no. Though, I will let others to decide because technically it is simply great and "WOW" is a abstract thing and varies for everyone. -- Pofka (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Pofka, quality is good, but the composition just doesn't work for me. The pond in the foreground is the main element of the picture and it just isn't eye-catching, sorry. Poco² 09:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose this image is tilted and no wow for me: the composition just doesn't work for me too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I used the integrated level camera and the tripod thus it is certainly not tilted, however 3 oppose is far too much -- Christian Ferrer 16:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment That might be good decision because that neutral one is almost opposing opinion. --Laitche (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)