Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pride NYC 2017 (51839).jpg

File:Pride NYC 2017 (51839).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2018 at 05:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pride NYC 2017 (51839).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pride NYC 2017 (51839).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events (Arts, concerts, shows...)
•  Info June is LGBT Pride Month, commemorating the Stonewall Riots, and I find myself looking through pictures from last year's parade in New York City. I keep coming back to this guy, doing his own thing by himself in the parade, facing up into the sun with this jubilant and unselfconscious expression that seems to fit the occasion really well. One of those images where I really don't know if others will think it worthy of FP, but if I'm going to nominate it, this is the month to do it. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment The subject itself is great, but the background is pretty busy and a bit distracting. That's of course difficult to avoid in a parade … I'll have to think about this for a bit. Just wanted to let you know that apparently one of your edits removed the EXIF data from the file (the first version still has it) --El Grafo (talk) 07:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. For some reason Lightroom retains EXIF but as soon as I put it through Photoshop it disappears. I'll restore it manually. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Done Looks like by using Photoshop's "Export" command I was stripping EXIF (and also reducing dpi!). Using the standard "save as" fixed it. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support I agree with you, this guy sticks in your mind with the pride and energy he exudes. Subject is sufficiently isolated from the background and since you spot more of the parade, he is placed in context. Otherwise he might look like a lone nut-job. --Cart (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart. He stands out from the crowd to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Granada (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition not FP for me. Charles (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charles. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 16:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Fortunately, « ridiculous does not kill », as we say in french.--Jebulon (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice atmosphere... --Karelj (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Cart's got a point there … --El Grafo (talk) 08:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not special enough for me. Yann (talk) 10:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others.--Ermell (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Patriccck (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)