Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponta de São Lourenço north north east.jpg

File:Ponta de São Lourenço north north east.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2013 at 12:47:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ponta de São Lourenço north north east.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponta de São Lourenço north north east.jpg

1300

834

167

150

10000

4571

2x dust spots

2933

567

167

1068

10000

4571

stitching error: colors are not the same: visible boundary

•  Info Ponta de São Lourenço Madeira, Portugal. c/u/n by   • Richard • [®] • 12:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --   • Richard • [®] • 12:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Only the definition in the shadow areas isn't perfect. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 13:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support wow! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support wow!. Very nice, it's beautiful! Leitoxx 14:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--ArildV (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice view. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per others --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice composition but too hazy. Would support if corrected. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't want to change it because it should be as realistic as possible. Why bending the reality for a support vote?   • Richard • [®] • 18:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good Richard, but colors seem oversaturated -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful. Nixón (wop!) 02:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice compositon, high resolution but imho the light is not optimal. The front rock (over 50% of the complete rock) is fully in shadow, light is only visible on the upper area over the front rock. I could imagine the light had beed better short before sunset. Otherwise an optimal shot is imho only possible in the summer when the sun gets further around the rock. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Despite season or time of day, the southeastern part of the edge of the cliff will not be fully exposed to direct sunlight. As you had mentioned previously, we have the choice of either exposing the frontal side of the cliff "to direct sunlight" or "hold out until we get a streak of sunlight". I personally find highlighting the foremost part of the cliff the most attractive, but that is up to everyones personal taste. Since i kept waiting for more diffused sunlight, the part which is not exposed to the sun is not entirely hidden in the shade. Therefore geological characteristics of the rock are still very much visible. In conclusion i find it rather positive, that you are considering these aspects, however i do have to say, that not all things can be managed theoretically by software tools. As a personal challenge i would go a step further in suggesting you search online for a better picture shot from the same angle. Maybe even one that already has been used commercially. I would like to review this with you. Regards.   • Richard • [®] • 12:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good composition. --Laitche (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 22:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support !WOW! Very NICE! Congratulations! ArionEstar (talk) 00:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Fantastic view! Halavar (talk) 00:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support great --Martin Kraft (talk) 13:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support if there's still room to jump on board... Wow.--Godot13 (talk) 20:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Please remove dustspot. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support good enough to become a FP --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the composition is not good: too much empty space at left, and not enough space at right. A very slight rotation should have been better, not enough to oppose, but prevents from support.--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /ArionEstar (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural