Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Point Wolfe Bridge.jpg

File:Point Wolfe Bridge.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2020 at 20:55:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Point Wolfe Bridge.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Point Wolfe Bridge.jpg

22

11

3344

3311

5000

3333

Crop suggested by Ikan Kekek.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Canada
•  Info: Point Wolfe Bridge, Fundy National Park, New Brunswick, Canada. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 23:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Please consider adjusting the brightness level. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Sure, adjusting down, I presume? The foreground boulders do seem a bit too bright. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

To me, it looks dark and underexposed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Maybe the light is a bit dull, but a nice scene nonetheless. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A nice shot, but not a wow for me. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not special enough --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment: brightness adjusted, Frank Schulenburg --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Something still looks a bit weird and I admit that I'm having a hard time to describe it. Have you selectively darkened the sky? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I uploaded a wrong version, please have another look. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose, no wow, seems very ordinary view and composition. Renata3 (talk) 06:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - Peaceful, green and nice, but I don't think this is an FP yet. I will suggest a crop, as I think that eliminating much of the right side and focusing this more on the bridge would work better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Maybe it's the moment we're in, but I find this very peaceful and relaxing. Wish that upper right wasn't so unsharp though. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

And while the suggested crop would moot that issue, it would come at the cost of the off-center subject that I think helps make this work. Daniel Case (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info: square crop suggested by Ikan Kekek. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose imho this crop makes it worse. If I were to crop, I would cut the green bushes at the bottom. Renata3 (talk) 07:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yeah, I think Renata3's suggestion is good, though I disagree that this crop makes it worse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Second thought: No, I don't agree about the patches of grass. The patches of grass in this version provide places for the eyes to travel in the lower corners and serve as somewhat of a counterpart to the sky, improving the form. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Renata3. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)