Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Hauptstrasse 188 Cafe-Bar 06032016 2870.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Poertschach Hauptstrasse 188 Cafe-Bar 06032016 2870.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2016 at 07:48:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  •  Info created and uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Yes, this is yet another of Johann Jaritz' photos of Pörtschach. However, far from being a striking panorama of the lake, this is a very pure, almost abstract composition that could be (mis)taken at first as publicity for a cafe-bar, but is actually just a great composition that happens to make use of that cafe-bar. I find it very enjoyable to move my eye around the picture frame, feeling the forms of the objects and visible elements of the building, porch, fence and street, and also the degree to which the photo looks symmetrical and actually isn't and the subtle interplay of light and shade. I find that this photo's composition is best viewed at full-page size; at full size, the picture is clear but the composition gets lost entirely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support The forms are just simple enough, and the colors strong enough, for this to work for me. Yes, the composition isn't perfect (I wouldn't miss that post at the bottom), but that's actually kind of charming. The only thing I'd want to be sure about is whether the sign is OK for a free image under Austrian FoP law ... I think it is, but it's not my specialty. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I appreciate that you gave it a fair shot. There doesn't seem to be too much interest in this picture, so it looks like a lot of people have sealed the fate of this nomination by abstaining, which is of course legitimate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]