Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Playa de Baquio, País Vasco, España, 2019-08-13, DD 25-34 PAN.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Playa de Baquio, País Vasco, España, 2019-08-13, DD 25-34 PAN.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2020 at 17:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Basque Country
- Info View of the beach of , Basque Country, Spain. Ok, new attempt for this recent nom, after I could redo the pano without the frame with lower sharpness. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose harsh midday light, right side is still out of focus, horizon now very curved and has stitching errors, bottom has cloning issues. --Ivar (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral same here sorry. And the waves don't transition smoothly anymore. I know you usually quickly fix at least the horizon, so I don't oppose. The blurry right part is not a big issue given the size. - Benh (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- And the bottom right corner looks like a patch which doesn't blend at all with the surrounding. Where does that come from? - Benh (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Benh, Ivar: I fixed the horizon, improved the cloning at the bottom left and fixed an stitching issue --Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but everything is blurred on the right side of the picture --Wilfredor (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Opposetemporary. There are still too many issues for me. Still a stitching error on the horizon, still the seam which can be seen (even at thumbnail size) on the waves (not an easy stitch, I reckon) and that patch en the bottom right corner (barrier to hide?) is quite obvious, even on thumbnail now for me. - Benh (talk) 09:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)- Support Good enough for me now, sharpness on the right is really not too bad when downsized, let's remember this is a 129mpx photo. Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Info Will upload a new version this evening (CET) to address the still mentioned issues Poco a poco (talk) 09:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- I couldn't find time yesterday but just uploaded a new version with fixes of the poor cloning at the very bottom, wave in the middle and horizon on the left. The bottom right area is also cloned due to a barrier (you got it right, Benh!) but I couldn't see any obvious stitching/cloning issues. I will look into it tomorrow again with more time, a note would be though helpful Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I think you mostly cleaned the issues. oppose removed. For the bottom right, the pattern you used is different enough so that I can spot it. The seam is also a bit hard. I added the annotation but not sure it helps... I wouldn't remove that part. It would break the composition (my two cents). - Benh (talk) 08:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Weak support: I'd get rid of the rightmost frame entirely: it's blurry and doesn't contribute much. Otherwise, impressive. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Info I made further improvements regarding stitching and also cropped the house on the right. FYI Benh, Ivar Poco a poco (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:35, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)