Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pietro Bembo - Titian - Museo di Capodimonte (Naples).jpg

File:Pietro Bembo - Titian - Museo di Capodimonte (Naples).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2021 at 18:50:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pietro Bembo - Titian - Museo di Capodimonte (Naples).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pietro Bembo - Titian - Museo di Capodimonte (Naples).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
•  Info created by Commonists - uploaded by Commonists - nominated by Commonists -- Commonists 18:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Commonists 18:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I think FP nominations of individual hung paintings have to be judged against the humongous, super-sharp reproductions we've been seeing, and by comparison, correct me if I'm wrong, but this photo seems noisy and unsharp at high magnifications. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Actually the photo is very sharp, you can see the canvas very well, it is not blurred but rather the style of Titian that is defined as "dirty" unlike other artists:"Titian was always highly regarded during these centuries as one of the great Old Masters, but critics during this time preferred Raphael, for his more obvious reverence for the art of antiquity.

This dispute between what is basically conservativism and progressivism stemmed from the differing opinions of draftsmanship during the Italian Renaissance. While artists like Raphael and Michelangelo preferred their paintings to be precisely drawn, precision was not as important to Venetian artists like Titian."[1], and anyway 30 mpx seem enough. Greetings.--Commonists 23:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

It's not that sharp at full or nearly full size, and I doubt that the kind of color noise I see is actually in small-groups-of-pixels or pixel-level areas on the painting. I love Tician's work, so it's not a question of my being unfamiliar with his style. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

I see it very clearly, then we simply see it differently. Greetings.--Commonists 00:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Gallery link refined ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment License is wrong. This is public domain -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Done thank you --Commonists 18:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan. Seems to be a fair amount of artifacts in the dark corners of the image as well. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)