Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PepperFlower4K

File:PepperFlower4K.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2024 at 02:04:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:PepperFlower4K Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PepperFlower4K

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Solanaceae
•  Info created by Bst9jkj - uploaded by Bst9jkj - nominated by Bst9jkj -- Bst9jkj (talk) 02:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bst9jkj (talk) 02:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Question What is the gallery? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

  I'm not too good with galleries since this is my first time, but it's supposed to be the family that pepper plants are in. if you could help me w/ galleries that'd be nice Bst9jkj (talk) 16:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

   Comment Gallery link fixed – given that the plant really belongs to the bell peppers (as the file category says) and hence to Capsicum annuum, the link is Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Solanaceae. But “pepper” is ambiguous. If the plant rather belongs to the Piperaceae, the gallery link would be Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Piperaceae, but that section does not exist yet (I will create it when necessary). AFAICS we have one “peppers” FP, File:Peppers in water.jpg, but that one concentrates on the fruit and hence is listed under Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw). --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unappealing composition, dull light and low quality, sorry. Also metadata missing, and uncalibrated color profile -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

  i added the version w/ metadata Bst9jkj (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Basile and the lack of a wow factor. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree that this is not an FP because of the extremely high standards for featuring flower pictures. However, I'd like to give this photo a little love. The resolution and details are really impressive for a cellphone! The categorization is bad, though. Please read COM:OVERCAT. I'd love to compare this to other flowers of the same species, but your categorization does not facilitate that, so I'll leave it to you to figure out whether it's the most useful photo in a suitable scope for a COM:VIC nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Could have been a perfect photo, if the branch on the left side was not there, and if the background was black or green, if the can in the background was removed, and if it has been a bit better light. But otherwise I like it. -- -donald- (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, but, per Ikan, this is not too far away from FP quality for a first try. You should nominate it at QI and I'm sure it'll get the badge Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)