Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peponocephala electra Mayotte.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Peponocephala electra Mayotte.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2018 at 11:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by Cyril di Bisceglie - uploaded by FredD - nominated by FredD -- FredD (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Support -- Outstanding wild picture of an extremely rare marine mammal, best one on the whole web. FredD (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, and no wow even if it were. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)- Oppose per Daniel. Properly a VI, but not more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional image, but it is not very lucky in this competition where there is a deviation of the votes which confuse quality and exception. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support the purpose to FPC is to promote the finest, I challenge someone to find a better image of this animal on the web. Try and you will see that this one is of course one of the finest image that you can see of this mammal. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Christian Ferrer Triton (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Christian F. Glad to see OTRS on rare material like this. --99of9 (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Question Am I seeing extensive processing around the animal where there are green areas, or are these natural? 13:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
- Oppose No response to my question. Charles (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Where do you see green areas ? I'm not the author, but according to him the plain blue is normal (and I have many pictures with similar background). FredD (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- I marked up the green areas. I do feel this has a significantly doctored background. But is plain blue normal? This is not my area of expertise, but looking at other images, most seem to have light rays visible. Charles (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Suisant7 (talk) 05:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please Suisant7 give a reason to oppose -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Per Daniel. It's really poor. -- Suisant7 (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Do you know any better picture of this animal in the history of mankind ? FredD (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think we don't vote for the best picture of this animal, but for FP. I'm sorry. -- Suisant7 (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, and in the FP guidelines you can read "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph." You can't judge a live picture of a marine animal on the same ground as wedding pictures... FredD (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think we don't vote for the best picture of this animal, but for FP. I'm sorry. -- Suisant7 (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Do you know any better picture of this animal in the history of mankind ? FredD (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Per Daniel. It's really poor. -- Suisant7 (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please Suisant7 give a reason to oppose -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad masking; a VI shure, a QI perhaps, a FP not IMO --Llez (talk) 10:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
