Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patrick Stewart 2012.jpg

File:Patrick Stewart 2012.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2016 at 06:04:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Patrick Stewart 2012.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patrick Stewart 2012.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Anders Krusberg / Peabody Awards - uploaded by MyCanon - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 06:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Mild support, as it's a pretty good portrait of an important actor with his award at a significant event, though I don't really feel wowed by it, partly because of his facial expression. Also, while the image is big enough for me, it is a little small for FP, if I understand correctly that 6 MP or greater are preferred. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Ikan there's no hard-and-fast rule. One 6MP image might be pin sharp and full of detail whereas a 12MP could be soft focus or so much NR there's no detail at all. But it would be hard to get much larger image for this ISO and 12MP camera used -- even a little cropping could reduce the MP considerably. An event photo like this can't really be compared to a studio photo in terms of expectations of resolution, say, though that means it has to compensate in other ways, and this rather boring pose doesn't imo. -- Colin (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose The background is too distracting. --Code (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Code. It is a shame so many events use these "repeating logo" backgrounds. No more than QI. The use of f/9 was probably not a great choice, raising the ISO high and robbing detail. No colourspace. -- Colin (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've seen better pictures of Patrick Stewart not making any facial expressions. And the light isn't doing him any favors, either. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin & Daniel. I wonder if Chace Watson/MyCanon is still around here somewhere... INeverCry 05:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Code. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)