Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia - Brasil(3).jpg

File:Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia - Brasil(3).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2015 at 03:16:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia - Brasil(3).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina - Bahia - Brasil(3).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created by Flickr - uploaded by Juniorpetjua - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 03:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 03:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think this is good photo but cannot find featured factor. If this one is the featured picture, there are so many FPs on the internet. --Laitche (talk) 13:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Laitche: Yes, there are so many FPs on the internet. The problem is: they are not uploaded at the Commons for several reasons (copyright, etc...). About this picture: I think it has wow: composition (the textures of the rocks, the reflection in the water, light) and place (a unusual FPC place). 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't think so, it's a normal shot with f/3.5 and probably PL filter for me, and too small for this type of foto in 2015, the place is no matter in other words no wow, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
      • @Laitche: I appreciate your opinion. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too little details for such a small picture of a static subject. Poor description (The description only mentions the name of the national park in which this formation is. Don't these caves have a name?). And even if the picture had a nice high resolution, the composition would not still be wow for me. --Xicotencatl (talk) 17:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The textures are interesting, but not FP-worthy-interesting and for this kind of shots it's much too small. --Code (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Kszapsza (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is not interesting enough for me. Perhaps something closer to the rule of thirds would be better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm very skeptical about the composition and am not even sure of what I shall look at. - Benh (talk) 11:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for all comments. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)