Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panthera tigris tigris Tidoba 20150306.jpg

File:Panthera tigris tigris Tidoba 20150306.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2016 at 10:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panthera tigris tigris Tidoba 20150306.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panthera tigris tigris Tidoba 20150306.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Stephenekka - uploaded by Stephenekka - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Info From the w:Tadoba Andhari Tiger Project.
•  Support -- Nikhil (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for showing us this beautiful animal, but before the photo can be reviewed as an FPC it needs to be renamed with a more meaningful name, the description and the categories also need to be improved. Take a look at some other photos of tigers, such as this one and you see how it can be done. cart-Talk 11:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Fixed the category, but I don't have the name changing rights. If you have it, can you do it please? Thanks in advance. Nikhil (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Click on the "More" tab at the top of the file's page, then on "Move", fill in the form with an appropriate name and someone will move it for you. It's your nomination so you should have the honor of naming it properly. :) The description still needs some work too. cart-Talk 13:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roleček 11:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose please rename it Ezarateesteban 12:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really don't want to be contemptuous but this is yet another tiger for me. The animal is not in a particularly attractive pose--AWeith (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only is an animal, not the content hidden!Goodmorninghpvn (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - The filename change went through. I still think that it should be specified what the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Project is. Is this a wild tiger or a tiger being cared for in some manner by people? I'm not sure I feel the animal is focused enough to support a feature, though. It seems like only part of its face (maybe only its nose) is fully in focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cat is beautiful but unfortunately it is not very sharp, the light is not attractive and the pose of the tiger is not very exiting. In short no wow, sorry. cart-Talk 20:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per cart. This is a good example of how sometimes it's not enough to just do everything you're supposed to do: the tiger's paw is forward and the photographer situated himself well. But any chance of an FP to me is undone by including so much wasted space off in the picture, especially with all that unsharpness and off-looking color. Cropping in might have been the only sensible thing to do (and even so, I wonder from the light why this had to be shot at ISO 320. Clearly the sun was out ... could 200 have worked? Or is this some issues with Canons I'm unaware of? Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --AlmaBeta (talk) 05:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support.  Info This is "Maya"; a famous tigress of en:Tadoba Andhari Tiger Project. Considering the small focal length, it can be taken this way. It is in wild; but frequent exposure to visitors may make it more friendly to humans. Jee 06:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Well it's not a zoo. DoF is ok and main subject in movement --The Photographer 11:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support fixed and good picture Ezarateesteban 12:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice expression. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  SupportM★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 10:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment TBH, I don't understand the oppose here. This is not a zoo, and the colors seem OK for a morning shot in March, when all the grass is dry and yellow. Yann (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support tiger in the wild ... nice shoot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 07:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not FP in composition, lighting. nor sharpness. Charles (talk) 09:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Ultimately, I agree with Charles. And I also think that this tigress, who has been habituated to humans, can be photographed better than this, even if it would take a lot of effort. Compare this picture of a jaguar by Charles. Isn't that a much better picture, and of a completely wild animal whose picture had to be taken from a boat in the distance? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)