Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 15:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (220°) from the Böllat on the Swabian Jura near Burgfelden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germany
  •  Info Panoramic view (220°) from the viewpoint Böllat on the Swabian Jura, including some summits of the Alps on an outstanding clear day. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Very weak oppose Sorry to do this as I very much like a lot of your work, but this doesn't do a lot for me. It's great quality and interesting, but I don't think it's outstanding in terms of either lighting or composition. It's just not a very exciting day in terms of light conditions, and the sweep of the panorama seems a little bit random. (For what it's worth I quite often have this objection to very wide panoramas, that they have no real clear focus.) Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose Technically well done and the compositional balance shows careful thought. Unfortunately, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - I'm not as jaded as you guys. With a panorama that extensive and sharp, I don't really care that much about the overall composition, because I'm too busy looking at the details and enjoying them. This kind of work still wows me and merits a star, in my opinion! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose It’s hard to set into words why I think this is both fascinating and not featurable. Quality is brilliant, but then mostly per Cmao20 – there's no clear message here, this picture doesn’t "talk" to me, it just conveys loads and loads of visual information on a fine clear day. Might be a matter of taste about what makes an image "special", but since you asked for our opinion, well, there’s mine. The dark part on the left is a bit distracting; I think it would work better without that, though that means outcropping the Alps. Technically it’s a bit oversharpened I’m afraid (see Plettenberg transmitter tower). --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral for now. There are some vertical stripes or banding in the sky, hard to see, but irritating; I suggest to remove them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per lack for good lighting and composition -- Colin (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info The message for use in any project is: This is the complete outlook from this quite prominent viewpoint on a day with outstanding good visibility. --Milseburg (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Not really a dramatic landscape, the shadow at left and the almost oversharpening take it out of FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]